« Book Review II: Like A Rolling Stone -- The Strange Life of A Tribute Band | Deep Linguistics Philosophy Question »


November 29, 2009

Religionphobic? Take the Quiz

You know who you are, and that you have it. Let’s name this condition with a more clinically pretentious sounding term: fideophobia (via Latin, fides, faith). Fideophobia is the hysterical fear of, or hostility towards, religious faith or those who observe one. I am not talking here about healthy skepticism, or even that Marxian ol’ time anti-religion that’s good enough for Mao. Nor do I mean hostility to specific faiths, which is something rival faith-holders can have for each other. For fideophobes I mean those who, after encountering just about any outward expression of religiosity, have a near-epileptic seizure.

To test if you have this condition, please answer the following questions, yes or no:

1 - When driving or riding about, and you see a bumper sticker or sign mentioning God, Jesus, salvation , Allah, Islam or Christ or G-d etc. , do you feel an uncontrollable urge to make a hostile or mocking observation to (fellow) passengers? [If you are only upset about specific religions and their manifestations, then that’s not a “yes”. In that case, you are merely a “—phobe” regarding a specific religion or group.]

2 -- Does the constant hypocrisy of religious people make you feel assured in the proof of their foolishness and error, the same way the constant hypocrisy of idealists or activists you agree with does not?

3 -- When you hear someone use words like God or blessings, or Jesus, or the Quran or the Torah favorably or as a deferential invocation, do your teeth move about, your eyeballs rattle, and strange gurgling sounds emanate from your brain, causing you to have to make a remark, tell them to shut up, seethe in fury, or run and hide?

4 -- When you hear religious preachers asking for money voluntarily from the individuals in their flocks, does this make you feel a moment of cynical triumph ("see, it's all about the money"), the same way you do NOT feel when the causes that you believe in ask for money, and even when those causes seek to get money coercively from taxpayers who may not agree with paying for them?

5 -- Do you feel in some way oppressed or threatened because someone else puts his or her faith in a silly or offensive ancient/medieval text? [Note: if your answer is that you feel oppressed and threatened when such a person infringes your rights based on that text, then that is not a “yes” answer; it must be if the mere belief that bothers you.]

6 -- Do you seriously think a "Darwin fish" or "The Flying Spaghetti Monster" is/are breathtakingly brilliant, over-the-top hilarious, and compellingly insightful satire(s) of the whole concept of religious belief?

7 -- Do you feel all religious faith is decisively refuted any time immigrants in the US Southwest get excited about the possible appearance of a weeping Virgin Mary in an automobile oil stain?

8 -- Do simplistic and/or ridiculous statements like "more people have been killed in the name of religion than any other cause" or “religion is a mental illness” get you all excited, nodding in self-righteous conviction, apparently overlooking concepts, words, and phrases like these:

"nationalism", “communism”, “racism” , “plunder”, "the king", “totalitarianism”, "the emperor", “astrology”, "the empire", “cult of personality”, "retaliation", “naziism”, "our people", “eugenics”, "territorial expansion", “manifest destiny”, "political or social grievances", "gold", "silver" , "class struggle", "progress", "civilization" , “slavery”, “colonialism", “liberty”, “socioeconomic rivalry" , “crimes of passion”, "bigotry", "resource competition", "dynastic opportunity", “substance abuse”, “trade routes”, or just plain “ideology”, “power”, “sadism” and "man, them folks sure do look weird"?

9 --[UPDATE: Added question 9]: Do you use words like "religionists" seriously? {No fair to say I used a self-coinage like "fideophobe" as I know it's silly.}]


If you answered “yes” to any of the above questions, you are probably a fideophobe.

It may have started with Dr. Dawkins, or an overdose of Mr. Hitchens.

One sees this species often, but not exclusively nor universally, among progressive and Euro/Middleast -lefty types, Randian libertarians, and Menckenite or Nietzschean conservatives. And in certain circles in very “Blue” areas of the USA, and in certain subcultures in “Red” America.

Maybe some bearded or robed guy made you feel dissed or bad for being female or gay or spontaneous or questioning or an infidel or something. Or did something even nastier. Or perhaps some weirdly authoritarian family member or government official distressed you in the name of Faith X or Deity Y.

Well, don’t worry. You see, your individual or cultural experiences, and resentment thereof, can explain the full range of human appetite towards meaning, and explain away whole traditions and common experiences in a nutshell. And don’t worry: Science, that system that still can’t even cure universally reviled skin-surface acne, can nevertheless fully explain and unravel the in-depth and varied subjective yearnings of countless intelligent human beings for truth, meaning, and values over generations in a complex, mysterious, and still ill-fathomed universe.

As a wise young lady recently reminded me: “The only people who take the Bible literally are fundamentalists and atheists”. That’s slightly unfair, I would alter that to “fundamentalists and fideophobes”. Atheists can be quite insightful. Fideophobes are often merely just annoying. Kind of like a lot of fundamentalists.

(And libertarians too, by the way, but you didn't hear that from me.)

Posted by Matthew Hogan at November 29, 2009 10:54 PM
Filed Under: American Culture , Egghead Stuff , Humor Attempts , Irony Watch , Random Personal , Rants- General , Religion , US Politics


Comments

Matthew,

I LOVE this! Richard Dawkins can't grind his teeth about this because he has not the sense of humor to GET this!

Thanks for cluing me in on this!

Randy

Posted by: Randy Beeler at November 30, 2009 09:59 PM

This post confuses disgust and indignation with fear. Those of us who are sick and tired of the pervasiveness of religion in daily life are not "afraid" of it; we are merely disgusted by its disproportionate influence, and the lies spread about it by its practitioners (e.g. "it's OK to persecute gays because the U.S. is a Christian nation"). The vast majority of people who are sick of being proselytized, of having "God" on our money and in our schools, believe fiercely that religionists should be free to believe and profess as they see fit. We are just sick of having it shoved in our faces, having our children indoctrinated behind our backs, and having the imprimatur of our secular government placed on private beliefs that the founders of our nation intended never to affect any public function of this nation. Calling that justified disgust "fear" is just another lie designed to elevate religionists in their own minds and insult freethinkers. It's certainly beneath the Christianity in which I was raised.

Posted by: Dave Wesner at December 2, 2009 11:34 AM

For a minute, I thought you were writing about fear of noodles.

Posted by: Eva Luna at December 2, 2009 11:50 AM

For a minute, I thought you were writing about fear of noodles.

Well, the Flying Spaghetti Monster people call themselves Pastafarians, but that wouldn't fit. Though shell pasta gives me vertigo. Somewhere I've also seen the term meaning fear of being alone; don't see the etymology.

This post confuses disgust and indignation with fear.

Noop. I quote me: "Fideophobia is the hysterical fear of, or hostility towards, religious faith or those who observe one."

And disgust often leads to fear or aversion towards what ever it is that grosses one out.

We are just sick of having it shoved in our faces, having our children indoctrinated behind our backs, and having the imprimatur of our secular government placed on private beliefs that the founders of our nation intended never to affect any public function of this nation. Calling that justified disgust "fear" is just another lie designed to elevate religionists in their own minds and insult freethinkers.

Give me a Q!
Give me an E!
Give me a D!

Posted by: matthew hogan at December 2, 2009 08:01 PM

Give me a Q!
Give me an E!
Give me a D!

Wow - another smug and unsupported proclamation of victory without analysis or cogent argument. In case I was not amply clear above, I know of no atheists, agnostics, Humanists, etc. who fear (or are hostile toward) "religious faith or those who observe one." We are hostile toward, and to some extent we fear, the unconstitutional and unconscionable imposition of religious values on a secular society, the indoctrination of our children in religion without our consent, and the use of our government and its resources to advance religious views or iconography. How you derived your self-satisfied "case closed" from my statement that "[t]he vast majority of people who are sick of being proselytized, of having 'God' on our money and in our schools, believe fiercely that religionists should be free to believe and profess as they see fit" escapes me, but I am reassured by your response that I was not incorrect in my underlying premise that those who choose to create and escalate conflicts with the non-religious are unconcerned with truth and fairness.

So much for my effort to define and limit the scope of my and others' response to the extent of religion in modern American life. You see what you want to see.

Posted by: Dave Wesner at December 3, 2009 12:19 PM

I think I've just discovered that QED can actually be squared.

Posted by: matthew hogan at December 4, 2009 11:32 PM

So I proved your point by demonstrating that you had no point. Gosh, guess I'll hang my head in abject defeat now, and concede your vastly superior reasoning. Oh wait - I'll try your tactic instead:

I win!

Wow. Guess I won.

Posted by: Dave Wesner at December 8, 2009 05:24 PM

Dave Wesner, congratulations!

I fully agree.

You have crushed the skull of Matt Hogan under your heel and won this debate with consummate ease.

Posted by: Ahem at December 9, 2009 07:00 AM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: