« Anti-techie rant: whatever happened to the off-switch? | Murphy's Law of Car Radio Music »


April 03, 2007

The Windsor: What makes this knot different from all other knots?

OK, I needed a Passover pun. Apologies to all 12 tribes of Israel (plus the Levites, depending on the reckoning.) And Happy Passover too to all. My knot concern, brought on by a recent semi-formal appearance, is this: although a Confirmed Slob, I retain, nevertheless, an almost womanly passion about that clothing decoration called a tie. (Wipe that Freud off your face!) Yet, sadly I don't know how to make the classy cool Windsor Knot, as opposed to the standard wussy and uneven inverted trapezoid. I am the son of a master Windsor Knotter but he got Alzheimer's before imparting the Secret. The Wikipedia link is circular and this page is only deceptively user-friendly, hopeless to follow. Is there anyone out there to help?

Posted by Matthew Hogan at April 3, 2007 10:04 PM
Filed Under: Random Personal


Comments

the link you have there to tie-a-tie is what i learned the windsor from. the funny triangle knot you do... is it a half-windsor?

Posted by: drdougfir [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 3, 2007 11:23 PM

I believe in going all the way.

It's instruction 3 that throws me, too many steps in one.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 12:54 AM

step 3 is cake!

just take the tie that's sticking straight up, put it down to the side that it just came up from and put it back behind the knot.

you're not an engineer, are you?

Posted by: drdougfir [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2007 12:57 AM

Not an engineer, but it says it's not rocket science, so since I can't do it as instructed, I must be a rocket scientist.

Not even close. Step 3 talks of something going to the right (a little spatially weird as I am left handed and looking at a reverse image) and the diagram is going to the person's left with a weird set of dots that don't match the instructions. And use terms that dont exist, like loop and not when there is no loop or knot.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 01:32 AM

Not an engineer, but it says it's not rocket science, so since I can't do it as instructed, I must be a rocket scientist.

Not even close. Step 3 talks of something going to the right (a little spatially weird as I am left handed and looking at a reverse image) and the diagram is going to the person's left with a weird set of dots that don't match the instructions. And use terms that dont exist, like loop and knot when there is no loop or knot.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 01:33 AM

hmm... those were the exact instructions i learned from without any additional assistance while in tunisia. i actually accidentally learned how to tie the half-windsor after the fact by being hasty in my tie tying. also, since i'm ambidextrous in many aspects of life, i can tie the windsor either with a right or left bias (ie: mirror image of the instructions shown).

i suppose you aren't geographically near so i could just show in you in person...

Posted by: drdougfir [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2007 01:38 AM

This is a trick, isn't it? Not even close to working. Must find other instructions.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 01:38 AM

to quote Admiral Akbar, "ITS A TRAP!"

no tricks involved. just follow the photos and not the written instructions.

Posted by: drdougfir [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2007 01:39 AM

Ah, I think I got it.

This one worked.

Issues:

1 -- It didn't use left and right, which throws a lefty off, but dominant and nondominant.

2 -- I think I want a DOUBLE Windsor as the semi-successful Windsors/half-windsors looked crappy too, while the semi-successful first try Double Windsor looked close to what I wanted.

3 -- Didn't leave enough narrow-end slack.

4 -- In each place, photos/drawings didnt help.

5 -- Still same problem of using loop and knot before there are loops and knots.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 02:07 AM

one needs a significant tie to properly tie a double windsor knot that doesn't look ridiculous.

congrads on learning the windsor!

Posted by: drdougfir [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2007 02:12 AM

Not sure I got the Windsor and the double comes out differently each time.

Must master this.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 02:21 AM

patience, grasshopper. dubai wasn't built in a day.

Posted by: drdougfir [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2007 02:24 AM

OK Youtube and this guy rule!

The tightening maneuvers are really the touch.

Posted by: matthew hogan at April 4, 2007 02:58 AM

Lefties are the only people in their right minds.

Posted by: Eva Luna [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 4, 2007 07:54 AM

Ha! I never knew that the Windsor/"Double Windsor" was the "mark of a cad" (according to James Bond, no less). That was the way my dad taught me to tie a tie as a kid and I've been doing it ever since.

Another thing I used to do was to tie it so that the wide end was really long and the narrow end barely existent, so that it would hang down way past my belt. I found out recently that the French (in some century) used to set the length of the tie so that the tip of the tie met with the tip of the penis (at least allegedly ... naturally there was cheating).

So I must have been following in the footsteps of the french side of the family (who really are a bunch of cads) without even knowing it ... yikes!

Posted by: Yuri Guri at April 6, 2007 02:09 PM

The windsor, eh? A mere trifle. Take a look at this site . . .

http://www.krawattenknoten.info/krawatten/Krawattenknoten/tieknot.html

Though why anyone would want to use a "Prat" knot escapes me.

For those of us who are hopelessly clumsy, the site also features a helpful ebay ad that offers, "Tie knots. Browse a huge selection now. Find exactly what you want today."

Posted by: Anonymous at April 25, 2007 04:38 PM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: